Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Modernism

1. Please choose three works by Mies and compare / contrast them to three works by Michael Graves.

The Seagram Building by Meis Van der Rohe ex
emplifies his simplistic view of architecture and the International Style. No extra “fluff” was added to the structure, it followed Mies’ opinion that “form follows function”. Michael Graves’ Portland Public Service Building goes in completely different direction than the Seagram’s building. The Portland building is much less sleeker than the Seagram building and it has unnecessary features, such as the maroon, black and purple decoration running up the middle whereas the Seagram building is basically a wall of glass. The Seagram building’s “wall of glass” structure made of steel, copper, and glass contrasts to the concrete structure with individual window holes of the Portland building. However, both buildings show a break in traditional architecture and exhibit original and new ways of thinking that would continue to influence future architects to come.



Mies’ Lakeshore Drive Apartments in Chicago stay true to his simplistic approach to architecture. They have the sleek steel and glass form that is so characteristic to Mies’ work. Graves’ Ocean Drive Condos in South Beach, Florida exemplifies his belief in “art for art’s sake”. It differs from Mies’ sleek structures in that the structure isn’t some form of a rectangular prism. It varies and on the part of the structure, it’s curved. The structure also doesn’t use the same glass- wall technique as Mies. It has individual windows and balconies protruding from the exterior walls.



Both Mies and Graves made furniture. Mies’s Barcelona chair exhibits all of his stylistic beliefs. The chair is simple, but made from the best materials he could find so that the chair would last as long as possible. Graves’ chair is curved and uses more materials than needed.






2. Please choose five examples to show how Phillip Johnson's acrhitecture moved from Modernism to Post-modernism. You must cite the Glass House and the AT&T Building.

Johnson’s “Glass House” exemplifies the Modern style that he learned from his mentor, van der Rohe. The “Glass House” is literally made of all glass with steel posts, the only room not visible from the outside is the bathroom. It has a flat ceiling and the post and lintel form that was essential to the Modernism architecture.



His Chapel of St. Basil shows the beginning of his experimentation with the Modernist style. He doesn’t use the glass curtain effect for the walls, but the simplistic post and lintel theme is definitely present.



The Puerta de Europa in Madrid, Spain shows a big shift in Johnson’s style. The building does use the glass curtain effect, but the structure itself is inclined at a 15 degree angle. That inclination goes against the Modernist idea that “form follows function” because the building does not need to be inclined to fulfill its function.



The PPG Palace in Pittsburgh also utilizes the glass curtain for its exterior to advertise the product of the company that uses the building, the Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company. However, the structure features decorative glass spires on the roof. The word “decorative” would never be used in describing a building done in the Modernist style.



The AT&T building is considered post-modern because of its use of decorative elements, such as the 7 story arching entryway and the decorative open pediment top.



3. Please describe the architecture of the Pompidou Centre.

The Pompidou centre is classified as post-modern or high-tech architecture. It is a steel structure reinforced with concrete floors.

4. Please identify works by and give a brief synopsis for each: Renzo Piano, Mario Botta (must be SFMoMA), Peter Eisenman, Zaha Hadid (must be The Firehouse), Daniel Liebskind (must be the Jewish Museum in Berlin).

Renzo is best known for his work in the Pompidou Centre. The Centre is one of the most original and unorthodox approaches to architecture that the world has ever seen. It is considered to be built in the high-tech style. (see question number 3)



Mario Botta designed the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. It is built in the post-modern style. It is a red brick building that features a black and white cylinder that protrudes from the middle, forming an atrium.



Peter Eisenman designed the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe in Berlin. It consists of 2,711 concrete slabs covering a 4.7 acre plot with an information room located underground. The slabs are meant to create a feeling of unrest and confusion, while the entire project follows a pattern and is ordered, but gives off an inhuman air.



Zaha Hadid is considered a deconstructionist architect. She designed the Vitra Firehouse. The structure is basically made of steel enforced concrete slabs resembling monoliths.



Daniel Liebskind designed the Jewish Museum in Berlin. It is a zig-zagging structure that looks like a warped Star of David. On the interior it has a “void” or empty black space is present above throughout the entire structure. An irregular pattern of windows can be seen best from the exterior.

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Francey Pants

1. Compare a portrait by David and a portrait by Delacroix.

David is known for his propaganda paintings of the French Revolution. In the portrait of Napoleon that I chose to compare to Delacroix's self portrait, he shows the militant leader as fearless and all- powerful. He glorifies war and portrays Napoleon's conquest as being glamorous. However, one cannot deny the impressive skill that David exhibits in his portraits. They are so life-like, they almost look as though they are a picture. He also uses light expertly, often using it as a device to convey a meaning. Such as in "The Death of Marat". He shines a beam of light over the letter that Marat holds in his lifeless hand, symbolizing hope.

Delacroix was a romantic who represented the beginnings of the impressionist style. He was less of a political propagandist painter than David was, painting historical scenes of the past (instead of paintings of current political leaders and events during the time of the French Revolution). However (and I know it is not a portrait but it expresses my point better), his painting, "Liberty Leading the People", captures a different side of the French Revolution than any of David's works. He captured the spirit of the people, the ones who fueled the revolution. He gave the people of France the credit for the success of it, instead some power- hungry man on a horse or a stuffy nobleman. Which goes back the word "romantic" that he has been labeled. He paints with passionate brushstrokes, but his finished product is far from the flawless works of David. Maybe there's something to that. David's portrait of Napoleon is far from realistic because it would be impossible to look so relaxed and in control while the horse that you are on is rearing up. The portrait portrays Napoleon to his people and the world as a godlike man who could control the world. He glorified the man who would come to name himself Emperor of France, completely contradicting everything that the revolution was about. He saw the upheaval in the French government as his chance to become absolute ruler of France instead of the French public's opportunity to have a say in the government that presides over them. Delacroix painted the spirit of the people during the revolution; the spirit of liberty. His brushstrokes are looser. He also uses light as an instrument to highlight something in the painting. In this case it's lady liberty bearing the French flag. They represent the ideals of liberty: truth and freedom. David's brushstrokes are clean. They represent past ways of thinking in that the portrait shows one man in control of not only people, but animals and nature. David's portrait of Napoleon is a piece of propaganda while Delacroix's painting of Lady Liberty and the people of France is a painting of the true spirit of passion and desire of justice that the people of France displayed during their revolt against the monarchical government that ruled them.


2. Compare Ingres vs. Delacroix's use of line

Ingres' line is virtually perfect. He was a student and follower of David and aspired to be a historical painter. His career was during Napoleon's conquests of Europe, which gave him the opportunity to study and borrow techniques

of the old masters so that he could perfect them. Delacroix's line was nowhere near the photograph-like quality of Ingres. Delacroix was sowing the seeds of the impressionist movement in painting with his style. Ingres painted with such a precision and relentless attention to detail. Delacroix was not interested in simply portraying

a highly realistic picture of someone posing, he was interested in expressing a certain emotion or idea with his passionate brushstrokes. He represented the future, while Ingres represented the past.


3. Research 'French Academy Painting', esp the work of Jerome and explain 1) how it continues French Neoclassical tradition and 2) How the Impressionists rebelled against it.

French Academy Painting is in the tradition of neo-classical painting. The work of David, Ingres, and Jerome can be classified as "French Academy Painting". It was focused on perfecting the techniques and style of the past. Romantics like Delacroix began the movement known as impressionism. His followers would be artists such as Monet, Manet, and Degas. They disregarded rules of line, form, and technique. They represented the future, while neo-classicism represented the past.




Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Georgian and Federal Style

Massachusetts Hall in Harvard Yard is an example of the Colonial Georgian style because it is symmetrical and spacious. It is basically a rectangular box with windows and doors. It also has chimneys on both ends which is characteristic of Georgian architecture. The Hall has chimneys in the center to accommodate the heating needs of such a large building. The Dormer windows on the top floor are common for Georgian buildings and were often the windows of the slave quarters. It was built when Georgian style was on the rise- 1720. The Georgian Period lasted from about 1720- 1840 (according to wikipedia) and is named for the four Georges that ruled England from the House of Hanover over that period of time.

The Federal style was a statement that the United States made to dissassociate themselves from the Feudal system of England. British buildings at this time were mostly in the Gothic style. The Federal style is reminiscient of ancient Greek and Roman styles. The United States wanted to model their government as well as their architecture after the republic and democracy of ancient Rome and Greece respectively. The Monticello building is classified as a Federal building for several reasons. It has columns in the ancient Roman and Greek style. It also has a rounded fan light over the door and features Palladian style windows, a high circular room and balustrades.


Monday, February 9, 2009

colonial furniture


Boston Colonial Art
This piece is a chest made of red and white oak
It is attributed to William Searle (American, 1634–1667); or Thomas Dennis (American, 1638–1706)
Made in Ipswich, Massachusetts







Armchair
1640–1700
Essex County, Massachusetts


















Desk and bookcase,
ca. 1779
Workshop of Nathaniel Gould (Amer
ican, 1734–1782)
American; Salem, Massachusetts
















All three of these examples of Boston colonial furniture exhibit intricate woodwork. The first two examples have very similar styling. They have simple structures but the designs on them are very intricate and detailed.


Chest
1685-1700
made by immigrant craftsmen. shows influences from Dutch, English and Welsh. The applied geometric molding of its drawers is similar to those found on late seventeenth-century Anglo-Dutch chests, wardrobes, and architectural woodwork.






Secretary Bookcase
1827
French influences
it again shows geometric patterns















Armchair

Made in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

1740-60






Philadelphia furniture is in more of a rococo style than Boston furniture. In the last two examples they have clawed feet

Thursday, January 29, 2009



Figure of Bodhidharma
17th century Ming Dynasty

Other people have what they need;
I alone possess nothing.
I alone drift about,
like someone without a home.
I am like an idiot, my mind is so empty.

























Wooded Mountains at Dusk
1666 Qing Dynasty
Kuncan

Open yourself to the Tao,
then trust your natural responses;
and everything will fall into place.













The Sixteen Luohans
1591 Ming Dynasty
Wu Bin

The ancient Masters were profound and subtle.
Their wisdom was unfathomable.
There is no way to describe it;
all we can describe is their appearance.
























Dish with Scalloped Rim
early 15th century
Ming Dynasty

Know the white,
yet keep to the black:
be a pattern for the world.
If you are a pattern for the world,
the Tao will be strong inside you
and there will be nothing you can't do.
























"Garden of the Unsuccessful politician"
1551 Ming Dynasty
Wen Zhengming

The Master never reaches for the great;
thus she achieves greatness.
When she runs into a difficulty,
she stops and gives herself to it.
She doesn't cling to her own comfort;
thus problems are no problem for her.



















Plate
Mid 14th century
Yuan Dynasty

Act without doing;
work without effort.
Think of the small as large
and the few as many.
Confront the difficult
while it is still easy;
accomplish the great task
by a series of small acts

























"Seven-lobed platter with scene of children at play"
14th century Yuan Dynasty

If you want to be a great leader,
you must learn to follow the Tao.
Stop trying to control.
Let go of fixed plans and concepts,
and the world will govern itself.







"Twin Pines, Level Distance"
ca. 1300 Yuan Dynasty
Zhao Mengfu

Seeing into darkness is clarity.
Knowing how to yield is strength.
Use your own light
and return to the source of light.
This is called practicing eternity.



















"Scholar by a Waterfall"
late 12th- early 13th century
Ma Yuan
Southern Song Dynasty

The supreme good is like water,
which nourishes all things without trying to.
It is content with the low places that people disdain.
Thus it is like the Tao.


"Dragon Pine"
ca. 1400
Wu Boli

When people see some things as beautiful,
other things become ugly.
When people see some things as good,
other things become bad.

Monday, January 12, 2009

Midterm

1. catayl hoyuk
anatolia
prehistoric

2. Venus of Willendorf
10,000 BC
prehistoric

3. Monumentality
dolmen- burial
2000 bc

4. Stonehenge
wessex culture
21st century bc

5. Great Serpent Mound
present day, ohio
10,000 bc

6. Great Pyramids of Giza
Egyptian

7. Palate of Narmer
Egyptian
10th century bc

8. Ashurbanipal and his queen
egyptian

9. King Tut death mask
Egyptian

10. Ziggurat
Sumerian

11. Sargon
Akkadian
8th century bc

12. Satuette
Sumerian

13. Victory Stele of Naram- Sim
Mesopotamian
8th century

14. The charioteers
akkadian
8th century

15. Snake goddess
minoan

16. Lystria and the bull
minoan

17. faceless statue
minoan

18. Octopus Jar
Minoan

19. bull rhyton
Minoan

20. Lions Gate
Assyrian
16,000 bc

21. death mask of agamemnon
assyrian

22. Dipylon Vase
Greek
21st century bc

23. Greek

24. Greek
black figured

25. Soldiers playing game
Greek

26. Kore
Greek
2,000 bc

27. Koros
Greek
early -

28. Kroisos
Greek

29. Koros
Greek

30. Kritios boy
Greek

31. Dionysis bowl
greek

32. Herakles strangling the lion
Greek

33. dying Soldier
archaic period
Greek

34. Dying soldier
Greek
classical

35. Horse
Greek
Classical

36.
Classical
Greek

37.
Polykleitos
Roman copy

38. Diskobolis
Myron
4th century bc
Greece

39.
Roman

40. centuar
roman

41. parthenon
roman
3 century bc

42.

43.
roman
3rd century bc

44.
roman
3rd century bc

45. Nike adjusting her sandal
roman
3rd century bc

46. Zeus
Greek
Classical period

47. Riace Warrior
Greek
Classical period

48. Constantine
Roman
4th century bc

49. Roman

50.
Roman
3rd century bc

51. Athena
roman
3rd century bc

52. Dying Soldier
Roman
3rd century bc

53. Zeus and the Snakes
Roman

54. Portrait of a Roman Senator
Roman

55. Augustus Prima Porta
Roman
4th century

56. Hadrian
4th century bc
roman

57. Constatine
Roman
3rd century bc

58. Ara Pacis
Roman
3rd century bc

59. Ixion Room
Roman
3rd century bc

60. Colosseum
roman

61. Pont du Gard
7th century bc
roman

62. Basilica of Constantine and Maxcentrus
Roman

63. scene from the Iliad by Homer
Roman

64. Roman

65.

66. the plan for the original st. peters
1st century ad

67. Justinian
Ravenna
Romanesque period

68. Sutton Hoo
18 century ad

69.
Celtic book
medieval period

70. St. Matthew
Medieval

71. The Last Judgement
Autun
Romanesque

72. Abbaye de Cluny
French
Romanesque

73.

74. Westminster Abbey
Gothic
England

75. Laon Cathedral

76. The Lamentation
Giotto
Renaissance

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Pie in the Sky


Above is a creation made by the Space 1026 in the Institute of Contemporary Art as part of Locally Localized Gravity art exhibit. It was inspired by a culture called the Ewoks. They live in trees and have rope bridges that connect them. This creation is entirely made out of recycled materials such as plastic bags and used paper and wood. The exhibit includes a video kiosk tower, interactive electronics, campfire, a gigantic cardboard ziggurat, and a tree house.